Claudelle Sharon Clare Miles v Hillman John Miles (aka) Johan Miles Abdullah & 3 ors; In the Estate of Wayde Stanley Miles [2006] NSWSC 918
The orders of the Sessions Court of Kelang, Malaysia, made on 5 July 1979, adopting Wayde and Claudelle to Stanley Alexander, satisfy the presumption under Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) s 116(5) as the evidence does not rebut residency or domicile requirements. The orders were made according to Malaysian law, and accordingly are to be recognised as valid and effective under NSW law pursuant to s 116; thus Wayde and Claudelle are taken as having been adopted under NSW law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Estate Administration and Recognition of Foreign Adoption / Hearing and Determination of Separate Questions Under Amended Summons
- Outcome
- Adoptions recognised; leave to proceed granted; costs of separate questions are plaintiff's costs in the proceedings; further directions for notification and expedition of the matter.
- Legal Topics
- ['recognition of Foreign Adoption' 'administration of Estate' 'intestacy' 'leave to Proceed Against Overseas Defendant' 'effect of Foreign Adoption Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Estate Administration and Recognition of Foreign Adoption / Hearing and Determination of Separate Questions Under Amended Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the adoption of Wayde Stanley Miles by Stanley Alexander in Malaysia in 1979 is valid and effective according to the law of New South Wales' 'Whether the adoption of Claudelle Sharon Clare Miles by Stanley Alexander in Malaysia in 1979 is valid and effective according to the law of New South Wales']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders of the Sessions Court of Kelang, Malaysia, made on 5 July 1979, adopting Wayde and Claudelle to Stanley Alexander, satisfy the presumption under Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) s 116(5) as the evidence does not rebut residency or domicile requirements. The orders were made according to Malaysian law, and accordingly are to be recognised as valid and effective under NSW law pursuant to s 116; thus Wayde and Claudelle are taken as having been adopted under NSW law.
Court Disposition
Adoptions recognised; leave to proceed granted; costs of separate questions are plaintiff's costs in the proceedings; further directions for notification and expedition of the matter.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to the plaintiff under UCPR r 11.4 to proceed against the first defendant.' 'Answer Yes to both questions regarding validity of the adoptions under NSW law.' "Costs of the separate questions are the plaintiff's costs in the proceedings." 'Stand these proceedings and proceedings 1134/06 over to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment