Re Neil (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1142
Given Neil’s age, vulnerability, prior mental health and criminal history, and the evidence that Neil was responding well to the Sherwood House program, it is in his best interests to make the recovery order and extend the secure accommodation and care orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Child Welfare Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment Following Hearing for Recovery and Extension of Secure Accommodation Orders
- Outcome
- Recovery order and extension of secure accommodation orders granted
- Legal Topics
- ['recovery Orders' 'secure Accommodation' 'best Interests of the Child']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Child Welfare Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment Following Hearing for Recovery and Extension of Secure Accommodation Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should make a recovery order under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) for Neil' "Whether it is in Neil's best interests to return to secure accommodation at Sherwood House"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given Neil’s age, vulnerability, prior mental health and criminal history, and the evidence that Neil was responding well to the Sherwood House program, it is in his best interests to make the recovery order and extend the secure accommodation and care orders.
Court Disposition
Recovery order and extension of secure accommodation orders granted
Orders
- ['Pursuant to sections 67T and 67U of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), all officers of the NSW Police Force are authorised and directed to locate and recover Neil and deliver him to the Secretary or delegate, using force if necessary, including stopping and searching vehicles and premises.' 'Orders extending secure...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment