SZNPO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1257
The Tribunal's adverse credibility finding was open on the evidence, and once this central claim was rejected, no jurisdictional error was established. Matters of fact and weight of evidence are for the Tribunal. The grounds of appeal do not reveal any error in the Tribunal's approach or in the Federal Magistrate's judgment. Thus, the appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- First Appellant: SZNPO; Second Appellant: SZNPP; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Status Determination, Jurisdictional Error, Procedural Fairness, Credibility Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZNPO
First Appellant
SZNPP
Second Appellant
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal misapplied the terms 'well founded fear' and 'refugee' under the Convention
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to apply the real chance test
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to identify the motivation for alleged persecution
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's adverse credibility finding was open on the evidence, and once this central claim was rejected, no jurisdictional error was established. Matters of fact and weight of evidence are for the Tribunal. The grounds of appeal do not reveal any error in the Tribunal's approach or in the Federal Magistrate's judgment. Thus, the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The appellants pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment