SZRBN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 984

SZRBN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 984

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the original application for judicial review was filed outside the time prescribed by s 477(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), no extension of time was sought or warranted due to lack of merit, and no substantial injustice would be suffered by refusing leave; the grounds for judicial review were without merit and did not warrant reconsideration of the decision.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal (judicial Review Proceeding) / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court; Determination of Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['refusal of Adjournment' 'procedural Fairness' 'time Limits for Application for Judicial Review' 'requirement for Extension of Time' 'appeals From Interlocutory Decisions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal (judicial Review Proceeding) / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court; Determination of Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the decision to dismiss the application as incompetent for non-compliance with Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 477(1) may be appealed' 'Whether refusal of adjournment involved denial of procedural fairness' "Whether grounds for judicial review of Tribunal's decision had sufficient merit for extension of time or leave to appeal"]

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the original application for judicial review was filed outside the time prescribed by s 477(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), no extension of time was sought or warranted due to lack of merit, and no substantial injustice would be suffered by refusing leave; the grounds for judicial review were without merit and did not warrant reconsideration of the decision.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The Application for leave to appeal is dismissed.' 'The First and Second Applicants are to pay the costs of the First Respondent.']