VRG Bidco Pty Ltd, in the matter of VRG Bidco Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1088
The requirements for relief under s 1322(4) are satisfied because the non-compliance was procedural and inadvertent, there was no dishonesty, and no substantial injustice would result from granting relief, while denial of relief would cause hardship.
- Parties
- First Applicant: VRG Bidco Pty Ltd; Second Applicant: Positive Investments Pty Ltd; Third Applicant: Village Roadshow Corporation Pty Ltd; Fourth Applicant: Village Roadshow Pty Ltd; Fifth Applicant: Roadshow Distributors Pty Ltd; Sixth Applicant: Roadshow Films Pty Ltd; Seventh Applicant: Village Cinemas Australia Pty Ltd; Eighth Applicant: Village Golf Holdings Pty Ltd; Ninth Applicant: Village Roadshow Digital Pty Ltd; Tenth Applicant: Village Roadshow Theatres Pty Ltd; Eleventh Applicant: Village Roadshow Theme Parks Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application for Relief Under S 1322(4) / Judgment Following Application (ex Tempore)
- Outcome
- Relief granted
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Civil Liability, Lodgement of Deed of Cross Guarantee, Financial Reporting Obligations, Procedural Irregularity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
VRG Bidco Pty Ltd
First Applicant
Positive Investments Pty Ltd
Second Applicant
Village Roadshow Corporation Pty Ltd
Third Applicant
Village Roadshow Pty Ltd
Fourth Applicant
Roadshow Distributors Pty Ltd
Fifth Applicant
Roadshow Films Pty Ltd
Sixth Applicant
Village Cinemas Australia Pty Ltd
Seventh Applicant
Village Golf Holdings Pty Ltd
Eighth Applicant
Village Roadshow Digital Pty Ltd
Ninth Applicant
Village Roadshow Theatres Pty Ltd
Tenth Applicant
Village Roadshow Theme Parks Pty Ltd
Eleventh Applicant
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application for Relief Under S 1322(4) / Judgment Following Application (ex Tempore)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether relief should be granted under s 1322(4) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for failure to lodge Deed of Cross Guarantee and certificate on time
- 2 Whether parties should be relieved from civil liability for non-compliance with s 6(1)(m) of the Instrument
Ratio Decidendi
The requirements for relief under s 1322(4) are satisfied because the non-compliance was procedural and inadvertent, there was no dishonesty, and no substantial injustice would result from granting relief, while denial of relief would cause hardship.
Court Disposition
Relief granted
Orders
- The time for the plaintiffs to lodge the Deed of Cross Guarantee and certificate is extended to 30 September 2024.
- The parties to the Guarantee and their current and former directors and officers are relieved from any civil liability for failing to lodge the Guarantee Documents by 30 June 2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment