Gunner v Lawrence; Lawrence v Gunner [2015] NSWCATCD 127
Stevenson J had found that Mr and Mrs Lawrence occupied the premises pursuant to a residential tenancy agreement for the purposes of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010, and that finding was binding on the Tribunal by res judicata and issue estoppel. Mrs Gunner's solicitor's letter of 27 October 2011 satisfied the formal requirements for a termination notice for a periodic agreement, was properly given, and specified a termination date at least 90 days after service. Mr and Mrs Lawrence had not vacated, and the termination application filed on 21 February 2012 was within the prescribed 30-day period. The Tribunal therefore had no discretion to refuse termination, and four weeks was an...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancy Applications for Termination and Possession and for a Declaration Under S 11 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 / Final Determination in NCAT After Remittal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- The tenancy agreement was terminated, possession was ordered for the landlord with the order for possession suspended for four weeks, and Mr and Mrs Lawrence's application was dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['remittal From Supreme Court' 'residential Tenancy Agreement' 'issue Estoppel and Res Judicata' 'validity of Termination Notice' 'termination of Periodic Agreement' 'order for Possession' 'costs in Ncat']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy Applications for Termination and Possession and for a Declaration Under S 11 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 / Final Determination in NCAT After Remittal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Stevenson J in the Supreme Court found that Mr and Mrs Lawrence occupied the premises pursuant to a residential tenancy agreement within the meaning of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010.' 'Whether the Tribunal was bound by the Supreme Court finding that there was a residential tenancy agreement.' 'Whether Mrs Gunner gave Mr and Mrs Lawrence a valid termination notice for a periodic agreement under s 85 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010.' 'Whether the application for termination and possession was filed within time and otherwise in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act 2010.' 'What date should be fixed for possession of the premises.']
Ratio Decidendi
Stevenson J had found that Mr and Mrs Lawrence occupied the premises pursuant to a residential tenancy agreement for the purposes of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010, and that finding was binding on the Tribunal by res judicata and issue estoppel. Mrs Gunner's solicitor's letter of 27 October 2011 satisfied the formal requirements for a termination notice for a periodic agreement, was properly given, and specified a termination date at least 90 days after service. Mr and Mrs Lawrence had not vacated, and the termination application filed on 21 February 2012 was within the prescribed 30-day period. The Tribunal therefore had no discretion to refuse termination, and four weeks was an...
Court Disposition
The tenancy agreement was terminated, possession was ordered for the landlord with the order for possession suspended for four weeks, and Mr and Mrs Lawrence's application was dismissed.
Orders
- ['In RT 15/51215 (RT 12/09391), the tenancy agreement is terminated and possession is to be given to the landlord immediately.' 'In RT 15/51215 (RT 12/09391), the order for possession is suspended for four weeks from the date of these orders.' 'In RT 12/15580, the application is dismissed.' 'Any application for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment