Roufas v Dreha t/as Sneaker Genius [2022] NSWCATCD 215

Roufas v Dreha t/as Sneaker Genius [2022] NSWCATCD 215

The premises were used as a shoe shop and the parties were parties to a retail shop lease within the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW). The claim for rent arrears and surrender of possession was a retail tenancy claim lodged within time, giving the Tribunal jurisdiction. The respondent was served but did not appear, so the hearing proceeded in his absence. The applicant's evidence established that the respondent breached the lease by failing to pay rent for more than 14 days, that arrears totalled $26,631.03 as at 10 November 2022, and that the applicant was entitled to payment and surrender of possession under s 72 of the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Retail Leases Application; Retail Tenancy Claim / Principal Judgment After Hearing in the Respondent's Absence
Outcome
Application allowed; respondent ordered to pay rent arrears, surrender possession, and Rental Bonds directed to pay the bond to the applicant's agent.
Legal Topics
['rent Arrears' 'outgoings' 'surrender of Possession' 'security Bond' 'ncat Jurisdiction' 'hearing in Absence of a Party']
['retail Leases' 'leases and Tenancies' 'consumer and Commercial Law'] ['rent Arrears' 'outgoings' 'surrender of Possession' 'security Bond' 'ncat Jurisdiction' 'hearing in Absence of a Party']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Retail Leases Application; Retail Tenancy Claim / Principal Judgment After Hearing in the Respondent's Absence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the proceedings.' 'Whether the proceedings should be heard in the absence of Mr Dreha.' 'Whether Mr Roufas is entitled to relief under the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) against Mr Dreha.']

Ratio Decidendi

The premises were used as a shoe shop and the parties were parties to a retail shop lease within the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW). The claim for rent arrears and surrender of possession was a retail tenancy claim lodged within time, giving the Tribunal jurisdiction. The respondent was served but did not appear, so the hearing proceeded in his absence. The applicant's evidence established that the respondent breached the lease by failing to pay rent for more than 14 days, that arrears totalled $26,631.03 as at 10 November 2022, and that the applicant was entitled to payment and surrender of possession under s 72 of the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW).

Court Disposition

Application allowed; respondent ordered to pay rent arrears, surrender possession, and Rental Bonds directed to pay the bond to the applicant's agent.

Orders

  • ['The respondent is to pay the applicant $26,631.03 immediately.' 'The respondent is to surrender possession of the premises at 83 Canterbury Road, Canterbury NSW 2193 to the applicant by 17 November 2022.' "Rental Bonds is directed to pay Bond Number R029619-1 to the applicant's agent Leon Roussakis of Ray White...