Beddoes v Macintosh & Prasser [2023] NSWCATCD 30
The landlord proved the rent arrears by the rent ledger and the tenants did not establish that the ledger was inaccurate. The landlord proved the carpets required cleaning and that repairs were required for damage conceded or otherwise found to have been caused by the tenants, so those amounts were allowed. The landlord did not prove the cleaning claim because the Tribunal placed little weight on the agent's evidence about date-stamped photographs, accepted the tenant had returned and cleaned at least some areas, was not satisfied marks on ceilings were caused by the tenants, and was not satisfied the quotation reliably reflected necessary cleaning costs. The tenants' claims for further...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancy Compensation and Rental Bond Dispute / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Landlord's application allowed in part; tenants' application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['rent Arrears' 'end of Tenancy Cleaning' 'carpet Cleaning' 'repairs for Damage' 'rental Bond' 'rent Abatement' 'extension of Time']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy Compensation and Rental Bond Dispute / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the tenants owed rent arrears for 24/11/2022 to 08/12/2022.' 'Whether the landlord proved entitlement to compensation for cleaning, carpet cleaning and repairs at the end of the tenancy.' 'Whether the Rental Bond Board should pay bond money to the landlord in satisfaction of any money order.' "Whether the tenants' compensation claim for flood-related cleaning costs and further rent abatement was brought within time or should be allowed to proceed by extension of time."]
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord proved the rent arrears by the rent ledger and the tenants did not establish that the ledger was inaccurate. The landlord proved the carpets required cleaning and that repairs were required for damage conceded or otherwise found to have been caused by the tenants, so those amounts were allowed. The landlord did not prove the cleaning claim because the Tribunal placed little weight on the agent's evidence about date-stamped photographs, accepted the tenant had returned and cleaned at least some areas, was not satisfied marks on ceilings were caused by the tenants, and was not satisfied the quotation reliably reflected necessary cleaning costs. The tenants' claims for further...
Court Disposition
Landlord's application allowed in part; tenants' application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The tenants Jason Macintosh and Jayminia Prasser are to pay the landlord the sum of $1179.65, comprising rent arrears $607.65, carpet cleaning $132.00 and repairs $440.00.' 'The Rental Bond Board is to pay the landlord Jamie Beddoes the sum of $1179.65 from rental bond S862158-6 in satisfaction of the money order....
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment