A [a pseudonym] v E Co [a pseudonym] [2018] NSWCA 188

A [a pseudonym] v E Co [a pseudonym] [2018] NSWCA 188

Leave to appeal was refused because the primary judge's discretion to reopen the hearing was not shown to have miscarried; no issue of principle justified appellate intervention; there was no denial of procedural fairness or injustice meeting the threshold for leave to appeal from an interlocutory procedural decision; and granting leave would risk further delay and expense contrary to efficient dispute resolution.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Orders
Outcome
Leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['reopening Proceedings' 'leave to Appeal' 'procedural Fairness' 'proprietary Estoppel' 'interlocutory Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Orders

  1. 1 ['Whether conditions for reopening proceedings were satisfied' 'Whether procedural fairness required reopening for further evidence on relief' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted from interlocutory procedural decisions']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the primary judge's discretion to reopen the hearing was not shown to have miscarried; no issue of principle justified appellate intervention; there was no denial of procedural fairness or injustice meeting the threshold for leave to appeal from an interlocutory procedural decision; and granting leave would risk further delay and expense contrary to efficient dispute resolution.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs']