Haslam v Money for Living (No 3) [2007] FCA 2089
Approval was granted as the settlement was fair, reasonable and adequate, in the interests of the group members as a whole, with no objections or opt-outs, and appropriate notice procedures were followed.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Mary Ann Haslam; Second Applicant: Bernard Dickens; Third Applicant: Phyllis Leslie Dickens; Fourth Applicant: Delia Lemon; Fifth Applicant: Estelle Sylvia Smith; Sixth Applicant: Elaine Mavis Gainsford; Seventh Applicant: Edward James Gainsford; Eighth Applicant: Yvonne Gray; Ninth Applicant: Athol Easterbrook; First Respondent: Money for Living (Aust) Pty Ltd (Receiver & Manager Appointed) ACN 107 611 218; Second Respondent: MFL Property Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver & Manager Appointed) ACN 111 105 125; Third Respondent: Stephen O'Neill; Fourth Respondent: Gary Dennis O'Neill; Fifth Respondent: Jolanta Simone Olszewski; Sixth Respondent: Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd; Seventh Respondent: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited; Eighth Respondent: Latrobe Investment Services Australia Pty Ltd ACN 007 416 211; Ninth Respondent: Cash Flow King Pty Ltd ACN 108 343 853; Tenth Respondent: Patrick O'Donnell; Eleventh Respondent: Bill Kafaltis; Twelfth Respondent: Jason Taleb; Thirteenth Respondent: Kerrili Pty Ltd ACN 097 980 222; Fourteenth Respondent: Registrar of Titles; Fifteenth Respondent: MKM Capital Pty Ltd ACN 117 776 464; Sixteenth Respondent: Recorder of Titles; Seventeenth Respondent: The Commissioner of State Revenue of Victoria; Eighteenth Respondent: The Commissioner of State Revenue of Tasmania; Nineteenth Respondent: Stable Technologies Pty Ltd ACN 062 528 545
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceeding (class Action) / Application for Approval of Settlement Under S 33 V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth)
- Outcome
- Settlement approved by the Court under s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
- Legal Topics
- Representative Proceedings, Settlement Approval, Court Discretion Under S 33 V
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Ann Haslam
First Applicant
Bernard Dickens
Second Applicant
Phyllis Leslie Dickens
Third Applicant
Delia Lemon
Fourth Applicant
Estelle Sylvia Smith
Fifth Applicant
Elaine Mavis Gainsford
Sixth Applicant
Edward James Gainsford
Seventh Applicant
Yvonne Gray
Eighth Applicant
Athol Easterbrook
Ninth Applicant
Money for Living (Aust) Pty Ltd (Receiver & Manager Appointed) ACN 107 611 218
First Respondent
MFL Property Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver & Manager Appointed) ACN 111 105 125
Second Respondent
Stephen O'Neill
Third Respondent
Gary Dennis O'Neill
Fourth Respondent
Jolanta Simone Olszewski
Fifth Respondent
Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd
Sixth Respondent
Perpetual Trustee Company Limited
Seventh Respondent
Latrobe Investment Services Australia Pty Ltd ACN 007 416 211
Eighth Respondent
Cash Flow King Pty Ltd ACN 108 343 853
Ninth Respondent
Patrick O'Donnell
Tenth Respondent
Bill Kafaltis
Eleventh Respondent
Jason Taleb
Twelfth Respondent
Kerrili Pty Ltd ACN 097 980 222
Thirteenth Respondent
Registrar of Titles
Fourteenth Respondent
MKM Capital Pty Ltd ACN 117 776 464
Fifteenth Respondent
Recorder of Titles
Sixteenth Respondent
The Commissioner of State Revenue of Victoria
Seventeenth Respondent
The Commissioner of State Revenue of Tasmania
Eighteenth Respondent
Stable Technologies Pty Ltd ACN 062 528 545
Nineteenth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceeding (class Action) / Application for Approval of Settlement Under S 33 V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed settlement of part of representative proceeding should be approved under s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
Approval was granted as the settlement was fair, reasonable and adequate, in the interests of the group members as a whole, with no objections or opt-outs, and appropriate notice procedures were followed.
Court Disposition
Settlement approved by the Court under s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Orders
- Settlement of representative proceeding in the terms of the deed of settlement between the applicants and the first and second respondents dated 13 November 2007 is approved.
- Applicants have the authority of group members to enter into and give effect to the deed of settlement and its covenants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment