Carr v JA Berriman Pty Ltd [1953] HCA 31
The building owner's (Carr's) cumulative conduct in failing to deliver the excavated site as required, and independently repudiating the obligation to deliver fabricated structural steel to Berriman Pty Ltd, constituted a repudiation of the building contract, thus entitling Berriman to rescind the contract lawfully and recover damages for loss of the contract and consequent loss including damages owed under a sub-contract.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / High Court of Australia Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Both appeals dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['repudiation' 'breach of Contract' 'rescission of Contract' 'damages' 'building Contracts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / High Court of Australia Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the building owner (Carr) committed repudiatory breaches of the building contract entitling the builder (Berriman Pty Ltd) to rescind and claim damages' "Whether the builder's purported rescission was a lawful exercise or itself a repudiation" 'Appropriate measure of damages for loss due to breach and rescission of contract']
Ratio Decidendi
The building owner's (Carr's) cumulative conduct in failing to deliver the excavated site as required, and independently repudiating the obligation to deliver fabricated structural steel to Berriman Pty Ltd, constituted a repudiation of the building contract, thus entitling Berriman to rescind the contract lawfully and recover damages for loss of the contract and consequent loss including damages owed under a sub-contract.
Court Disposition
Both appeals dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Both appeals dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment