Bradbery v Hay [2011] NSWSC 623
The failure to state the occupations of the two attesting witnesses, and the failure of the petition to adequately set out the facts relied upon to invalidate the election, are breaches of mandatory statutory requirements. These defects render the Amended Petition invalid, and it must be dismissed. No amendment may be made after the expiry of the statutory period.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Gordon Bradbery; First Respondent: Noreen Hay; Second Respondent: Electoral Commissioner of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Application for Summary Dismissal of Amended Petition
- Outcome
- Amended Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Requirements of Election Petitions, Non Compliance With Formal Requisites, Summary Dismissal, Election Invalidity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gordon Bradbery
Petitioner
Noreen Hay
First Respondent
Electoral Commissioner of New South Wales
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Application for Summary Dismissal of Amended Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to state occupations of attesting witnesses renders petition invalid
- 2 Whether facts relied upon to invalidate the election are adequately stated in the petition
- 3 Whether amendment is possible after 40 days from return of writ
Ratio Decidendi
The failure to state the occupations of the two attesting witnesses, and the failure of the petition to adequately set out the facts relied upon to invalidate the election, are breaches of mandatory statutory requirements. These defects render the Amended Petition invalid, and it must be dismissed. No amendment may be made after the expiry of the statutory period.
Court Disposition
Amended Petition dismissed
Orders
- Amended Petition dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment