JOHNS v THE LAW SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1991] NSWCA 158
The claimant demonstrated, through evidence of honest, blameless conduct and rehabilitation since being struck off for professional misconduct, that he is now fit and proper to be readmitted as a solicitor; the previous misconduct, while serious, did not connote irrebuttable moral incapacity.
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert James Johns; Opponent: The Law Society of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Restoration to the Roll of Solicitors / Hearing Before Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted; claimant admitted to the Roll as Attorney, Solicitor and Proctor of the Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Legal Topics
- Restoration to Roll, Fitness to Practise, Professional Misconduct, Rehabilitation of Solicitors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert James Johns
Claimant
The Law Society of New South Wales
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Restoration to the Roll of Solicitors / Hearing Before Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is now a fit and proper person to be admitted to practice as a solicitor after being previously struck off for professional misconduct
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant demonstrated, through evidence of honest, blameless conduct and rehabilitation since being struck off for professional misconduct, that he is now fit and proper to be readmitted as a solicitor; the previous misconduct, while serious, did not connote irrebuttable moral incapacity.
Court Disposition
Application granted; claimant admitted to the Roll as Attorney, Solicitor and Proctor of the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Orders
- The claimant be admitted as an Attorney, Solicitor and Proctor of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
- The claimant pay The Law Society of New South Wales' costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment