Falloon v Madden; Madden v Madden [2012] NSWSC 652
Margaret and Bill each contributed to the purchase price of the Woolooware Property and thus, in the absence of a presumption of advancement and in the context of Bill's bankruptcy, a resulting trust arose in proportion to their contributions (49.5% for Margaret, 50.5% for Bill). Bill’s interest vested in the Official Trustee as after-acquired property under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). Both held their equitable interests as tenants in common.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff (2010/332163); Second Defendant (2011/25063): Eve Falloon; Second Plaintiff (2010/332163); Third Defendant (2011/25063): Chad Falloon; Defendant (2010/332163); First Defendant/executor (2011/25063): Michael Madden; Plaintiff (2011/25063): William Madden (Bill)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings (trusts/estates) / Principal Judgment on Declaration of Trust and Reimbursement Claims
- Outcome
- Resulting trust as to a part interest in property established; entitlement to recovery from deceased's estate of some amounts established; further consideration required regarding Official Trustee and occupation fee; orders to follow after short minutes.
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trust, Co Ownership, Bankruptcy and After Acquired Property, Entitlement to Estate Assets, Contribution to Property Purchase, Equitable Accounting, Occupation Fee
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eve Falloon
First Plaintiff (2010/332163); Second Defendant (2011/25063)
Chad Falloon
Second Plaintiff (2010/332163); Third Defendant (2011/25063)
Michael Madden
Defendant (2010/332163); First Defendant/executor (2011/25063)
William Madden (Bill)
Plaintiff (2011/25063)
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings (trusts/estates) / Principal Judgment on Declaration of Trust and Reimbursement Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a resulting trust exists regarding the Woolooware Property based on contributions to purchase price
- 2 Whether the beneficiary’s share in trust property vested in the Official Trustee due to bankruptcy
- 3 Whether interests were held as joint tenants or tenants in common
Ratio Decidendi
Margaret and Bill each contributed to the purchase price of the Woolooware Property and thus, in the absence of a presumption of advancement and in the context of Bill's bankruptcy, a resulting trust arose in proportion to their contributions (49.5% for Margaret, 50.5% for Bill). Bill’s interest vested in the Official Trustee as after-acquired property under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). Both held their equitable interests as tenants in common.
Court Disposition
Resulting trust as to a part interest in property established; entitlement to recovery from deceased's estate of some amounts established; further consideration required regarding Official Trustee and occupation fee; orders to follow after short minutes.
Orders
- Declaration that a resulting trust arose with Margaret’s estate holding a 49.5% beneficial interest and Bill a 50.5% interest (currently vested in the Official Trustee).
- Bill may recover from Margaret’s estate 49.5% of council rates paid and the specified amounts ($50,000, $119,877.26) paid towards the estate’s tax debts, and $156,034.06 (plus interest) for Radcliffe mortgage payments; precise orders reserved pending further submissions and consideration of occupation fee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment