Ning v Cong [2022] NSWCATAP 176
Because the appellants (lessors) refused to negotiate in good faith in response to a request from the respondents (lessees) for rent relief and failed to comply with the obligations under the Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Regulation (No 2) 2020, they are barred from taking prescribed action to recover the disputed rent and associated costs for the relevant period.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Helen Ning; Second Appellant: Max Fei; First Respondent: Scott Cong; Second Respondent: Hong Zhao
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Disposition
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Retail Leases, COVID 19 Regulation, Renegotiation of Rent, Impact of Failure to Negotiate, Good Faith in Leasing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helen Ning
First Appellant
Max Fei
Second Appellant
Scott Cong
First Respondent
Hong Zhao
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether landlord negotiated rent relief as required under COVID-19 regulations
- 2 Whether failure to negotiate in good faith prevented recovery of accrued rent and costs
Ratio Decidendi
Because the appellants (lessors) refused to negotiate in good faith in response to a request from the respondents (lessees) for rent relief and failed to comply with the obligations under the Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Regulation (No 2) 2020, they are barred from taking prescribed action to recover the disputed rent and associated costs for the relevant period.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal the decision be refused;
- The appeal be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment