George Hudson Limited v Australian Timber Workers' Union [1923] HCA 38

George Hudson Limited v Australian Timber Workers' Union [1923] HCA 38

The majority held that the amendment to s.24(1) of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act, effected by s.3 of the 1921 Act, operates such that agreements made, and successors or assignees arising, before its commencement are within its scope, imposing obligations from the date of the amendment. This construction is neither truly retrospective nor unjust, as the future obligation arises prospectively, and is appropriate to the legislative purpose. The power to bind successors/assignees is incidental to the arbitration power. Case stated procedure and the Judiciary Act entitle hearing of those legal questions, and the High Court's exclusive jurisdiction is properly engaged. The...

Parties
Appellant; Defendant: George Hudson Limited; Respondent; Informant: Australian Timber Workers' Union
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 1923
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated (removal From Supreme Court of New South Wales to the High Court) / Determination of Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation Issues After Conviction by Stipendiary Magistrate and Case Stated in Supreme Court
Outcome
conviction affirmed; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Retrospective Operation of Statutes, Binding Effect of Industrial Agreements on Successors and Assignees, Limits of Commonwealth Legislative Power, Jurisdiction of State Supreme Court and High Court (judiciary Act S 40a), Appeals and Case Stated Procedure, Conciliation and Arbitration
Constitutional Law Industrial Law Statutory Interpretation Retrospective Operation of Statutes Binding Effect of Industrial Agreements on Successors and Assignees Limits of Commonwealth Legislative Power Jurisdiction of State Supreme Court and High Court (judiciary Act S 40a) Appeals and Case Stated Procedure +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Hudson Limited

Appellant; Defendant

Australian Timber Workers' Union

Respondent; Informant

Procedural Posture

Appeal by Way of Case Stated (removal From Supreme Court of New South Wales to the High Court) / Determination of Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation Issues After Conviction by Stipendiary Magistrate and Case Stated in Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the amendment to s.24(1) of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-1920, by s.3 of the 1921 Act, applies to agreements and succession occurring before its commencement;
  2. 2 Whether the amendment validly extends binding effect of agreements to successors, assignees or transmittees, or is unconstitutional;
  3. 3 Whether State Supreme Court, on a case stated from an inferior court, may entertain a point of law not raised below;

Ratio Decidendi

The majority held that the amendment to s.24(1) of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act, effected by s.3 of the 1921 Act, operates such that agreements made, and successors or assignees arising, before its commencement are within its scope, imposing obligations from the date of the amendment. This construction is neither truly retrospective nor unjust, as the future obligation arises prospectively, and is appropriate to the legislative purpose. The power to bind successors/assignees is incidental to the arbitration power. Case stated procedure and the Judiciary Act entitle hearing of those legal questions, and the High Court's exclusive jurisdiction is properly engaged. The...

Court Disposition

conviction affirmed; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The question asked by the case stated should be answered No.
  • Costs in the Supreme Court and in the High Court to be paid by the defendant company.