Application By Orica IC Assets Ltd & Ors Re Moomba To Sydney Gas Pipeline System [2004] ACompT 1
The Tribunal held that s 38 required a de novo review in which it stood in the shoes of the Minister and was bound to apply s 1.36 of the National Gas Code without limitation, including consideration of all statutory criteria rather than only Criterion (b). The Minister had made one decision in relation to the whole MSP Mainline, although it operated differently on different parts of that pipeline, so the review was not confined to the Moomba to Marsden section. The Canberra Lateral was not part of the MSP Mainline and was not within the scope of the review of the Minister's decision concerning the MSP Mainline.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of a Ministerial Decision on Revocation of Coverage Under the National Third Party Access Code for Natural Gas Pipeline Systems / Preliminary Ruling on the Scope of the Tribunal's Review
- Outcome
- The Tribunal ruled on the scope of the review, holding that the Ministerial decision under review concerned the MSP Mainline and that the Tribunal must apply s 1.36 of the National Gas Code without limitation.
- Legal Topics
- ['review of Ministerial Decision' 'national Gas Code Coverage Revocation' 'scope of De Novo Review' 'moomba to Sydney Gas Pipeline System']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of a Ministerial Decision on Revocation of Coverage Under the National Third Party Access Code for Natural Gas Pipeline Systems / Preliminary Ruling on the Scope of the Tribunal's Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application for review was confined to the revocation of coverage for the part of the MSP Mainline from Moomba to Marsden or extended to the whole MSP Mainline.' "Whether the Tribunal's review was confined to Criterion (b) or required consideration of all statutory criteria in s 1.9 and s 1.36 of the National Gas Code." 'Whether the Canberra Lateral was within the scope of the review.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that s 38 required a de novo review in which it stood in the shoes of the Minister and was bound to apply s 1.36 of the National Gas Code without limitation, including consideration of all statutory criteria rather than only Criterion (b). The Minister had made one decision in relation to the whole MSP Mainline, although it operated differently on different parts of that pipeline, so the review was not confined to the Moomba to Marsden section. The Canberra Lateral was not part of the MSP Mainline and was not within the scope of the review of the Minister's decision concerning the MSP Mainline.
Court Disposition
The Tribunal ruled on the scope of the review, holding that the Ministerial decision under review concerned the MSP Mainline and that the Tribunal must apply s 1.36 of the National Gas Code without limitation.
Orders
- ["The decision of the Minister which is the subject of the review by the Tribunal is as follows: 'In accordance with section 1.34 of the National Third Party Access Code for Natural Gas Pipeline Systems (National Gas Code), I have decided that coverage of the Moomba to Wilton gas transmission pipeline (the MSP...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment