SNC (No 1) [2014] NSWCATGD 17
The appointment of enduring guardian was revoked because of family conflict and doubts regarding Mrs SNC's capacity at the time of execution, combined with evidence that revocation was in her best interests. A limited guardianship order was necessary due to Mrs SNC’s demonstrated lack of capacity for significant life decisions, ongoing family conflict, and the need for independent decision-making regarding access. Mr DBC was found to be a competent carer and was appointed as guardian for accommodation, health, and services. The Public Guardian was appointed to determine and manage contact/access with Mr KBK due to high conflict.
- Parties
- Subject Person: Mrs SNC; Enduring Guardian, Carer, Applicant for Review of Power of Attorney: Mr DBC; Applicant, Alternative Enduring Guardian: Mr KBK; Appointed Guardian (access/contact): The Public Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review of Enduring Guardianship and Guardianship Application / Decision After Hearing; Partial Adjournment (power of Attorney Issues)
- Outcome
- Enduring guardianship revoked; limited guardianship order made for 12 months. Public Guardian appointed for access; Mr DBC appointed as private guardian for accommodation, health care, and services. Power of attorney review adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Enduring Guardianship, Appointment of Guardians, Capacity Assessment, Best Interests, Family Conflict, Review of Power of Attorney
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs SNC
Subject Person
Mr DBC
Enduring Guardian, Carer, Applicant for Review of Power of Attorney
Mr KBK
Applicant, Alternative Enduring Guardian
The Public Guardian
Appointed Guardian (access/contact)
Procedural Posture
Review of Enduring Guardianship and Guardianship Application / Decision After Hearing; Partial Adjournment (power of Attorney Issues)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointment of enduring guardian should be revoked
- 2 Whether Mrs SNC had capacity at the time of appointments and revocations
- 3 Who should be appointed guardian and for which functions
Ratio Decidendi
The appointment of enduring guardian was revoked because of family conflict and doubts regarding Mrs SNC's capacity at the time of execution, combined with evidence that revocation was in her best interests. A limited guardianship order was necessary due to Mrs SNC’s demonstrated lack of capacity for significant life decisions, ongoing family conflict, and the need for independent decision-making regarding access. Mr DBC was found to be a competent carer and was appointed as guardian for accommodation, health, and services. The Public Guardian was appointed to determine and manage contact/access with Mr KBK due to high conflict.
Court Disposition
Enduring guardianship revoked; limited guardianship order made for 12 months. Public Guardian appointed for access; Mr DBC appointed as private guardian for accommodation, health care, and services. Power of attorney review adjourned.
Orders
- The appointment of Mr DBC as enduring guardian revoked.
- The Tribunal treats the matter as a guardianship application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment