BME [2016] NSWCATGD 33
The Tribunal was not satisfied that Mrs MZS's past performance or expenditure, viewed in light of NSW Trustee and Guardian supervision and its view that there was no wrongdoing and no present basis for seeking removal, made revocation of her appointment necessary. However, Mrs BME's best interests required prompt and effective exploration of access to value in her half share of the regional NSW house and avoidance, if possible, of expensive court proceedings. The irretrievable breakdown between Mrs MZS and Mr EXE was a significant impediment to non-curial resolution about that property. Appointment of the neutral and independent NSW Trustee and Guardian would best promote Mrs BME's...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Revocation of Financial Management Order; Requested Review of Appointment of Financial Manager; Application for Leave to Represent / Principal Judgment After Hearing in the Guardianship Division
- Outcome
- Financial management order retained; appointment of private manager revoked; NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed; application to revoke financial management order dismissed; leave for legal representation granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['revocation of Financial Management Order' 'review of Appointment of Financial Manager' 'appointment of NSW Trustee and Guardian' 'private Manager Expenditure and Supervision' 'best Interests of Protected Person' 'legal Representation Before Tribunal' 'conflict of Duty']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Revocation of Financial Management Order; Requested Review of Appointment of Financial Manager; Application for Leave to Represent / Principal Judgment After Hearing in the Guardianship Division
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the financial management order in respect of Mrs BME's estate should be revoked." "Whether Mrs MZS's appointment as financial manager should be revoked and the NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed instead." "Whether alleged excessive or unsustainable expenditure by Mrs MZS made revocation of her appointment in Mrs BME's best interests." "Whether conflict between Mrs MZS and Mr EXE over the regional NSW property impeded effective non-curial resolution in Mrs BME's interests." 'Whether leave should be granted for Mr Stuart Latham to represent Mrs MZS at the hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was not satisfied that Mrs MZS's past performance or expenditure, viewed in light of NSW Trustee and Guardian supervision and its view that there was no wrongdoing and no present basis for seeking removal, made revocation of her appointment necessary. However, Mrs BME's best interests required prompt and effective exploration of access to value in her half share of the regional NSW house and avoidance, if possible, of expensive court proceedings. The irretrievable breakdown between Mrs MZS and Mr EXE was a significant impediment to non-curial resolution about that property. Appointment of the neutral and independent NSW Trustee and Guardian would best promote Mrs BME's...
Court Disposition
Financial management order retained; appointment of private manager revoked; NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed; application to revoke financial management order dismissed; leave for legal representation granted.
Orders
- ["The appointment of Mrs MZS as manager of Mrs BME's estate was revoked." "The NSW Trustee and Guardian was appointed as manager of Mrs BME's estate in her stead." "The application for revocation of the financial management order in respect of Mrs BME's estate was dismissed." "Leave was granted to Mr Stuart Latham...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment