R v Inu [2019] NSWDC 783
Given the offender's early guilty plea, youth, lack of relevant criminal antecedents, and special circumstances, an aggregate sentence of 4 years 6 months' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years 3 months is appropriate for two counts of robbery in company under s.97(1), dating from 18 December 2018.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years 6 months with non-parole period of 2 years 3 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['robbery in Company' 'aggregate Sentencing' 'sentencing Principles']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for two counts of robbery in company under Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s.97(1)?' "How do the offender's youth, prior record, and subjective circumstances affect sentencing?" 'What is the appropriate non-parole period considering special circumstances?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's early guilty plea, youth, lack of relevant criminal antecedents, and special circumstances, an aggregate sentence of 4 years 6 months' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years 3 months is appropriate for two counts of robbery in company under s.97(1), dating from 18 December 2018.
Court Disposition
Aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years 6 months with non-parole period of 2 years 3 months.
Orders
- ['Aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years 6 months from 18 December 2018.' 'Fix a non-parole period of 2 years 3 months from 18 December 2018, expiring 17 March 2021.' 'Balance of sentence is 2 years 3 months from 18 March 2021 to 17 June 2023.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment