R v Nikolovski [2018] NSWSC 1156
The offender was not criminally responsible for the discharge of the firearm or the wounding or death of Mr Parry because the agreed enterprise involved using an unloaded gun and an axe to frighten occupants during a robbery, and the discharge of the firearm was outside that agreement. However, the robbery was a very serious example of robbery whilst armed with a dangerous weapon because three masked intruders entered residential premises in the early morning while armed with a shortened rifle and an axe and stole property. The offender's mental condition did not reduce his moral culpability for the offence, the late guilty plea had no meaningful utilitarian value, and some accumulation...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence for Robbery Whilst Armed With a Dangerous Weapon / Sentencing After Acquittal on Murder at the Direction of the Court and Guilty Plea to Robbery Whilst Armed With a Dangerous Weapon
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted and sentenced to 6 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years and 9 months; charges on the s 166 certificate were dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['robbery Whilst Armed With a Dangerous Weapon' 'home Invasion' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'objective Seriousness' 'moral Culpability and Mental Disorder' 'guilty Plea and Utilitarian Discount' 'parity' 'totality' 'special Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Sentence for Robbery Whilst Armed With a Dangerous Weapon / Sentencing After Acquittal on Murder at the Direction of the Court and Guilty Plea to Robbery Whilst Armed With a Dangerous Weapon
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the offender should be sentenced on the basis that he bore criminal responsibility for the shooting or wounding of Robert Parry, although not for his death.' 'The objective gravity of the robbery whilst armed with a dangerous weapon.' "Whether the offender's mental conditions reduced his moral culpability." 'Whether the late guilty plea or conduct of the trial warranted a discount or reduction in sentence.' "The relevance of parity with Daniel Petryk's sentence." 'The application of totality given the offender was serving sentences for other 2015 armed robberies.' 'Whether special circumstances should be found.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender was not criminally responsible for the discharge of the firearm or the wounding or death of Mr Parry because the agreed enterprise involved using an unloaded gun and an axe to frighten occupants during a robbery, and the discharge of the firearm was outside that agreement. However, the robbery was a very serious example of robbery whilst armed with a dangerous weapon because three masked intruders entered residential premises in the early morning while armed with a shortened rifle and an axe and stole property. The offender's mental condition did not reduce his moral culpability for the offence, the late guilty plea had no meaningful utilitarian value, and some accumulation...
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted and sentenced to 6 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years and 9 months; charges on the s 166 certificate were dismissed.
Orders
- ['For the offence of the robbery whilst armed with a dangerous weapon committed on 7 March 2015, at Wickham in the State of New South Wales, the offender, Jesse Nikolovski is convicted.' 'I sentence him to a term of 6 years imprisonment, to date from 11 November 2017 and expiring on 10 November 2023.' 'I specify a...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment