BYI18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 803

BYI18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 803

The Authority did not commit jurisdictional error in applying s 473DD. For each challenged item of new information, it was open to the Authority to conclude that the appellants had not satisfied it that the information could not have been provided to the delegate before the delegate's decision or otherwise met the statutory requirements. The Facebook posts lacked examples and dates, the information about the brother concerned events said to have occurred before the delegate's decision and could have been communicated earlier given the first appellant's daily contact with his mother, and the photographs were taken before the delegate's decision and did not address a disputed matter in a...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review of an Immigration Assessment Authority Decision / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From Orders Dismissing the Appellants' Application for Judicial Review
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['safe Haven Enterprise Visas' 'fast Track Reviewable Decision' 'immigration Assessment Authority' 'new Information' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 473 Dd' 'jurisdictional Error' 'judicial Review']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['safe Haven Enterprise Visas' 'fast Track Reviewable Decision' 'immigration Assessment Authority' 'new Information' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 473 Dd' 'jurisdictional Error' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review of an Immigration Assessment Authority Decision / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From Orders Dismissing the Appellants' Application for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court judge failed to consider all grounds raised by the appellants.' 'Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority committed jurisdictional error in its interpretation or application of s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' "Whether the Authority was entitled to conclude that information about Facebook posts, the first appellant's brother, and family photographs did not satisfy s 473DD(b)(i) or s 473DD(b)(ii)."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Authority did not commit jurisdictional error in applying s 473DD. For each challenged item of new information, it was open to the Authority to conclude that the appellants had not satisfied it that the information could not have been provided to the delegate before the delegate's decision or otherwise met the statutory requirements. The Facebook posts lacked examples and dates, the information about the brother concerned events said to have occurred before the delegate's decision and could have been communicated earlier given the first appellant's daily contact with his mother, and the photographs were taken before the delegate's decision and did not address a disputed matter in a...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellants pay the first respondent's costs to be assessed in default of agreement."]