Veranda Cafe Northbridge Pty Ltd v Morgan [2008] NSWSC 1032

Veranda Cafe Northbridge Pty Ltd v Morgan [2008] NSWSC 1032

The defendant, in contravention of s 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987, made false and misleading representations about the turnover, net profit, and food costs of both the café and bakery businesses. These misrepresentations were relied upon by the plaintiff in deciding to purchase the business. The actual financial results fell significantly short of the figures represented. The reliance on these misrepresentations caused quantifiable loss to the plaintiff and the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for those losses and related interest. The plaintiff is not liable for the outstanding balance on the contract price.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 October 2008
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
['sale of Business' 'misrepresentation' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'damages' 'reliance']
['trade and Commerce'] ['sale of Business' 'misrepresentation' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'damages' 'reliance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Principal Judgment / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether misrepresentations were made by the defendant regarding turnover and profitability of the business' 'Whether the plaintiff relied upon such misrepresentations' 'Whether the defendant is liable under s 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987' 'Assessment of damages resulting from misrepresentations']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, in contravention of s 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987, made false and misleading representations about the turnover, net profit, and food costs of both the café and bakery businesses. These misrepresentations were relied upon by the plaintiff in deciding to purchase the business. The actual financial results fell significantly short of the figures represented. The reliance on these misrepresentations caused quantifiable loss to the plaintiff and the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for those losses and related interest. The plaintiff is not liable for the outstanding balance on the contract price.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • ['Plaintiff awarded damages in the sum of $542,102.68 plus interest of $193,900' 'Declaration that the plaintiff is not liable to pay the outstanding sum of $200,000 on the contract for the purchase of the business']