KA & anor v Protective Commissioner & anor [2009] NSWADT 66
The Tribunal held that despite KB's strong emotional attachment and wishes, the Protective Commissioner made the correct and preferable decision to sell the property, given its derelict condition, lack of income, annual financial shortfall, and the need to secure the estate for KB's continued maintenance.
- Parties
- First Applicant: KA; Second Applicant: KC; First Respondent: Protective Commissioner; Second Respondent: KB
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Decision on Review
- Outcome
- The Protective Commissioner's decision to sell KB's share of the property is affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Property, Protected Estates, Subject Person's Wishes, Emotional Attachment, Financial Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KA
First Applicant
KC
Second Applicant
Protective Commissioner
First Respondent
KB
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Decision on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Protective Commissioner's decision to sell KB's share of property was correct and preferable
- 2 Whether KB's wishes regarding retention of the property should override other considerations
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that despite KB's strong emotional attachment and wishes, the Protective Commissioner made the correct and preferable decision to sell the property, given its derelict condition, lack of income, annual financial shortfall, and the need to secure the estate for KB's continued maintenance.
Court Disposition
The Protective Commissioner's decision to sell KB's share of the property is affirmed.
Orders
- The decision of the Protective Commissioner to sell KB's share of the property belonging to KB, KC and Brother B is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment