Estee Lauder Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation for the Commonwealth of Australia [1988] FCA 254
The sale value for sales tax purposes of goods treated as stock for retail sale is to be calculated based on a notional wholesale price from a hypothetical manufacturer under similar manufacturing conditions, including necessary royalties and technical service fees for industrial property, but excluding retail selling, advertising, and promotion expenses. Mr Burger's wholesale price calculations are generally appropriate but must be adjusted to include royalties and technical service fees proportionally; retail-related expenses are not to be included.
- Parties
- Applicant / Cross Respondent: Estee Lauder Pty Limited; Respondent / Cross Claimant: Commissioner of Taxation for the Commonwealth of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Sales Tax Dispute / Post Remittal From High Court, Determination of Special Questions
- Outcome
- Special questions to be answered according to Mr Burger's calculations, adjusted to include royalties and technical service fees; parties to make further submissions/calculations as directed.
- Legal Topics
- Sales Tax Assessment, Valuation of Goods, Industrial Property Rights, Revenue Legislation Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Estee Lauder Pty Limited
Applicant / Cross Respondent
Commissioner of Taxation for the Commonwealth of Australia
Respondent / Cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Sales Tax Dispute / Post Remittal From High Court, Determination of Special Questions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether calculation of hypothetical wholesale price under s.18(2)(b) of Sales Tax Assessment Act (No.1) 1930 should include royalties and technical service fees for industrial property
- 2 Whether advertising, promotion, and selling expenses should be included in wholesale price calculation
- 3 Whether previous wholesale selling prices are an appropriate guide post-retail transition
Ratio Decidendi
The sale value for sales tax purposes of goods treated as stock for retail sale is to be calculated based on a notional wholesale price from a hypothetical manufacturer under similar manufacturing conditions, including necessary royalties and technical service fees for industrial property, but excluding retail selling, advertising, and promotion expenses. Mr Burger's wholesale price calculations are generally appropriate but must be adjusted to include royalties and technical service fees proportionally; retail-related expenses are not to be included.
Court Disposition
Special questions to be answered according to Mr Burger's calculations, adjusted to include royalties and technical service fees; parties to make further submissions/calculations as directed.
Orders
- Applicant (Estee Lauder) to bring in short minutes to reflect reasons.
- Further hearing on appropriate order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment