Commissioner of Taxation v FH Faulding & Co Ltd [1950] HCA 42

Commissioner of Taxation v FH Faulding & Co Ltd [1950] HCA 42

The respondent's cordials were not exempt under item 36 (3) because they did not consist principally of juices of Australian fruits. Australian fruit juice constituted only 29 per cent by volume and 26.4 per cent by weight of the lemon cordial, and 13.4 per cent by volume and 11.44 per cent by weight of the raspberry balm cordial. The phrase "consisting wholly or principally" required a quantitative test by weight or volume, not a test based on the ingredient giving distinctive flavour or character.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Sales Tax Recovery Action Concerning Claimed Exemption / Appeal From Decision of Rich J. to the High Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs.
Legal Topics
['sales Tax Exemption' 'fruit Juice Cordials' 'meaning of "consisting Wholly or Principally"' 'quantitative Construction by Weight or Volume']
['taxation' 'statutory Interpretation'] ['sales Tax Exemption' 'fruit Juice Cordials' 'meaning of "consisting Wholly or Principally"' 'quantitative Construction by Weight or Volume']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Sales Tax Recovery Action Concerning Claimed Exemption / Appeal From Decision of Rich J. to the High Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether lemon cordial and raspberry balm cordial manufactured and sold by the respondent were exempt from sales tax under item 36 (3) of the First Schedule to the Sales Tax (Exemptions and Classifications) Act 1935-1948.' 'Whether the cordials "consisted principally" of juices of Australian fruits when Australian fruit juice was not more than half of their content by weight or volume.']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent's cordials were not exempt under item 36 (3) because they did not consist principally of juices of Australian fruits. Australian fruit juice constituted only 29 per cent by volume and 26.4 per cent by weight of the lemon cordial, and 13.4 per cent by volume and 11.44 per cent by weight of the raspberry balm cordial. The phrase "consisting wholly or principally" required a quantitative test by weight or volume, not a test based on the ingredient giving distinctive flavour or character.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Order of Rich J. discharged.' 'In lieu thereof judgment for plaintiff for amount claimed and costs of action.']