Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 7) [2010] FCA 1107
Given the potential for the confidential exhibit to provide a springboard for identifying a Schutz customer, and pending finalisation of access arrangements, the exhibit should remain confidential and be sealed until further order. Costs are awarded at 50% to Schutz given their ultimate success on the application despite the initial filing error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['sealing Orders' 'confidential Information' 'court File Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a confidential exhibit inadvertently filed on the court file should be sealed until further order.' 'Whether the confidential information has commercial sensitivity justifying a sealing order.']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the potential for the confidential exhibit to provide a springboard for identifying a Schutz customer, and pending finalisation of access arrangements, the exhibit should remain confidential and be sealed until further order. Costs are awarded at 50% to Schutz given their ultimate success on the application despite the initial filing error.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['The confidential exhibit SEJ3 to the third affidavit of Mr Steven Edward Oliver Johnston filed on 13 July 2010 be sealed on the Court file until further order of this Court.' "The respondents/cross-claimants are to pay 50% of the applicants/cross-respondents' costs of the motion to be taxed if not agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment