J Bernard & Co Pty Ltd v Langley [1980] HCA 39

J Bernard & Co Pty Ltd v Langley [1980] HCA 39

The majority held that the pleaded facts did not show that the challenged provisions imposed an impermissible burden on the plaintiff's interstate trade. Sections 43 and regs. 14 and 15, as pleaded, prescribed reasonable public health and inspection rules for the meat trade and did not discriminate against interstate trade; s. 29 merely provided a sanction and did not itself burden interstate trade. Accordingly, the provisions were not shown to be repugnant to s. 92 of the Constitution, and the defendants' demurrer was allowed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
High Court Action Seeking Declarations, Damages and Costs Concerning the Seizure of Meat and the Validity or Applicability of New South Wales Meat Inspection Provisions Under S. 92 of the Constitution / Demurrer to the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim
Outcome
Demurrer allowed with costs.
Legal Topics
['section 92 of the Constitution' 'freedom of Interstate Trade and Commerce' 'meat Inspection and Seizure' 'regulatory Laws and Discrimination' 'inspection Laws']
['constitutional Law' 'trade and Commerce' 'public Health Regulation' 'statutory Interpretation'] ['section 92 of the Constitution' 'freedom of Interstate Trade and Commerce' 'meat Inspection and Seizure' 'regulatory Laws and Discrimination' 'inspection Laws']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

High Court Action Seeking Declarations, Damages and Costs Concerning the Seizure of Meat and the Validity or Applicability of New South Wales Meat Inspection Provisions Under S. 92 of the Constitution / Demurrer to the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether ss. 29 and 43 of the Meat Industry Act 1978 N.S.W. were void or inapplicable to the plaintiff's interstate meat trade by reason of s. 92 of the Constitution." 'Whether reg. 15 of the Meat Inspection and Stamping Regulations 1978 N.S.W. was void by reason of s. 92 of the Constitution.' 'Whether the challenged provisions were no more than reasonable regulatory measures directed to inspection, hygiene and public health.' "Whether the plaintiff's pleading disclosed facts showing an impermissible burden on interstate trade."]

Ratio Decidendi

The majority held that the pleaded facts did not show that the challenged provisions imposed an impermissible burden on the plaintiff's interstate trade. Sections 43 and regs. 14 and 15, as pleaded, prescribed reasonable public health and inspection rules for the meat trade and did not discriminate against interstate trade; s. 29 merely provided a sanction and did not itself burden interstate trade. Accordingly, the provisions were not shown to be repugnant to s. 92 of the Constitution, and the defendants' demurrer was allowed.

Court Disposition

Demurrer allowed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Demurrer allowed with costs.']