Biocare Global LLC v David Frederick Booth Willis t/as Augmented Creative Studio [2023] NSWDC 65
The plaintiff is a foreign corporation and admits it cannot pay a costs order if adverse. There is no evidence that the company's director will stand behind the plaintiff for costs. Therefore, security for costs is appropriate and must be provided by the plaintiff to protect the defendant, with the amount set at $27,000, subject to future revision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Security for Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Plaintiff ordered to provide security for costs; proceedings stayed if security not provided; orders reserved for future revision; orders for costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'foreign Corporate Plaintiff' 'uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (nsw) R 42.21']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Security for Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered against a foreign corporate plaintiff' 'Impecuniosity of the plaintiff and its impact on proceedings' 'Merits of the defence in context of security for costs' 'Risk of evidence and instructions from foreign jurisdictions']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is a foreign corporation and admits it cannot pay a costs order if adverse. There is no evidence that the company's director will stand behind the plaintiff for costs. Therefore, security for costs is appropriate and must be provided by the plaintiff to protect the defendant, with the amount set at $27,000, subject to future revision.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff ordered to provide security for costs; proceedings stayed if security not provided; orders reserved for future revision; orders for costs in the cause.
Orders
- ["The Plaintiff to provide security for the Defendant's costs in the sum of $27,000 by payment into court within 28 days of 10 March 2023." 'In the event of the Plaintiff failing to satisfy Order 1, the proceedings be stayed until security is provided.' 'These orders are to be revisited by the Court when the matter...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment