T & H PTY LIMITED v Nguyen; T & H PTY LIMITED trading v Trinh; T & H PTY LIMITED v Trinh; T & H PTY LIMITED v 304 Chapel Rd Pty Ltd [2022] NSWDC 82
A material change in circumstances was demonstrated by the Referee’s findings that the plaintiff owed money to the defendants, justifying an order for further security for costs of $61,000, given the likely costs of a further six-day hearing and the plaintiff corporation’s conceded inability to pay a costs order.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/cross Defendant: T & H PTY LIMITED trading as Brown Consultants; 1st Defendant: Linh Trinh Nguyen; 2nd Defendant: Thanh Tuan Trinh; 3rd Defendant/1st Defendant in Other Proceeding: Chi Thanh Trinh; 4th Defendant: Eng Trinh Ngo; 5th Defendant: King Trinh Trinh; 6th Defendant: Nhu Ngoc Ha; 2nd Defendant: Thi Bich Lien Pham; 2nd Defendant/1st Defendant: Thanh Chi Trinh; 1st Defendant/cross Claimant: 304 Chapel Rd Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Further Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Application for further security for costs granted.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Referee's Report, Impecuniosity, Case Management, Cross Claim, Discretionary Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T & H PTY LIMITED trading as Brown Consultants
Plaintiff/cross Defendant
Linh Trinh Nguyen
1st Defendant
Thanh Tuan Trinh
2nd Defendant
Chi Thanh Trinh
3rd Defendant/1st Defendant in Other Proceeding
Eng Trinh Ngo
4th Defendant
King Trinh Trinh
5th Defendant
Nhu Ngoc Ha
6th Defendant
Thi Bich Lien Pham
2nd Defendant
Thanh Chi Trinh
2nd Defendant/1st Defendant
304 Chapel Rd Pty Ltd
1st Defendant/cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Further Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there has been a material change in circumstances warranting further security for costs after the Referee's Report
- 2 Whether the amount and manner of security sought is appropriate
- 3 Whether further security would stultify the proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
A material change in circumstances was demonstrated by the Referee’s findings that the plaintiff owed money to the defendants, justifying an order for further security for costs of $61,000, given the likely costs of a further six-day hearing and the plaintiff corporation’s conceded inability to pay a costs order.
Court Disposition
Application for further security for costs granted.
Orders
- The plaintiff provide further security for the defendants' costs of the proceedings in an amount of $61,000 within 28 days.
- The plaintiff pay the defendants’ costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment