Incomlend Pte Ltd v Insurance Australia Ltd (No. 2) [2024] NSWSC 1564
Each party achieved substantial, but not complete, success on different issues in the motion for security for costs. The appropriate order is that the costs of the motion be costs in the cause.
- Parties
- Second Defendant/first Applicant: Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co Ltd; Third Defendant/second Applicant: BCC Trade Credit Pty Ltd; First Plaintiff/first Respondent: Incomlend Pte Ltd; Second Plaintiff/second Respondent: Amicorp Trustees (Singapore) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs / Costs Determination Following Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs of the motion be costs in the cause
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Costs Determination, Commercial Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co Ltd
Second Defendant/first Applicant
BCC Trade Credit Pty Ltd
Third Defendant/second Applicant
Incomlend Pte Ltd
First Plaintiff/first Respondent
Amicorp Trustees (Singapore) Limited
Second Plaintiff/second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs / Costs Determination Following Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs of the security for costs motion should follow the event or be costs in the cause
Ratio Decidendi
Each party achieved substantial, but not complete, success on different issues in the motion for security for costs. The appropriate order is that the costs of the motion be costs in the cause.
Court Disposition
Costs of the motion be costs in the cause
Orders
- The costs of the Second and Third Defendants' motion filed 25 July 2024 be costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment