Checked-Out Pty Ltd v Eagle Eye Inspections Pty Ltd of NSW [1999] FCA 1565

Checked-Out Pty Ltd v Eagle Eye Inspections Pty Ltd of NSW [1999] FCA 1565

The $65,000 paid into Court on 26 August 1999 was to stand as security for the costs of all respondents because that was the intention underlying the earlier order. Although it might ultimately prove inadequate, the proceeding was at an early stage, no defences had been filed, discovery and evidence were still in the future, and the respondents' costs estimates were global, undetailed and apparently indemnity-based. There was therefore no sufficient evidentiary basis to quantify additional security without guesswork, so additional security was refused at this stage.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 November 1999
Procedural Posture
Federal Court Civil Proceeding / Interlocutory Motions for Security for Costs
Outcome
The Court ordered that the existing $65,000 paid into Court be security for the costs of all respondents, declined to order additional security, and reserved the costs of the security for costs motions.
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'additional Security for Costs' 'assessment of Likely Costs' 'insolvency of Corporate Applicant']
['civil Procedure' 'costs'] ['security for Costs' 'additional Security for Costs' 'assessment of Likely Costs' 'insolvency of Corporate Applicant']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Federal Court Civil Proceeding / Interlocutory Motions for Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the $65,000 paid into Court should stand as security for the costs of all respondents or only some respondents.' "Whether the first applicant should be ordered to provide additional security for the respondents' costs at the present stage of the proceeding." 'Whether the evidence provided a sufficient basis to quantify any additional security for costs.']

Ratio Decidendi

The $65,000 paid into Court on 26 August 1999 was to stand as security for the costs of all respondents because that was the intention underlying the earlier order. Although it might ultimately prove inadequate, the proceeding was at an early stage, no defences had been filed, discovery and evidence were still in the future, and the respondents' costs estimates were global, undetailed and apparently indemnity-based. There was therefore no sufficient evidentiary basis to quantify additional security without guesswork, so additional security was refused at this stage.

Court Disposition

The Court ordered that the existing $65,000 paid into Court be security for the costs of all respondents, declined to order additional security, and reserved the costs of the security for costs motions.

Orders

  • ['The sum of $65,000 paid into Court on 26 August 1999, and the investments representing that sum, be security for the costs of all respondents in this proceeding.' 'The Court declines to order that the first applicant provide additional security.' "The costs of the respondents' motions for security for costs be...