Burgess v Centrelink [2007] FCA 595
Given the lack of merit in the appeal, the appellant’s inability to pay existing and future costs orders, and the absence of oppression or respondent misconduct, an order for security for costs is appropriate, even considering the special context of a dispute between a citizen and the executive.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Security for Costs Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Order for security for costs made; appeal stayed until provision of security; costs ordered against appellant
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'appeal Procedure' 'advance Payment of Social Security Benefits']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Security for Costs Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an order for security for costs of an appeal should be made against an appellant in a dispute between a citizen and the executive' 'What principles and discretionary factors apply to an application for security for costs in such a context']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the lack of merit in the appeal, the appellant’s inability to pay existing and future costs orders, and the absence of oppression or respondent misconduct, an order for security for costs is appropriate, even considering the special context of a dispute between a citizen and the executive.
Court Disposition
Order for security for costs made; appeal stayed until provision of security; costs ordered against appellant
Orders
- ['Darren John Burgess to provide security for costs of the respondents for the appeal in the amount of $2,000.' 'The appeal is stayed until security is provided or further order.' 'Each party has liberty to apply to the court on seven days notice.' 'Darren John Burgess to pay the costs of the respondents of and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment