A W Ellis Engineering Pty Ltd v Malago Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1623
No order for security should be made because the corporate plaintiffs, as trustees, have a right of indemnity from trust assets, and the individual plaintiffs have undertaken to be liable for any costs orders without limitation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Defendants' Application for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Defendants' application for security for costs dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'trustee Right of Indemnity' 'enforcement of Mediation Agreements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Defendants' Application for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered against plaintiffs including individuals and corporate trustees' 'Whether individual plaintiffs are properly joined' 'Whether plaintiffs’ assets are sufficient to meet a costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
No order for security should be made because the corporate plaintiffs, as trustees, have a right of indemnity from trust assets, and the individual plaintiffs have undertaken to be liable for any costs orders without limitation.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application for security for costs dismissed
Orders
- ['No order for security for costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment