John Caines Management Pty Ltd v Adrenalin International Powersports Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 747

John Caines Management Pty Ltd v Adrenalin International Powersports Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 747

The respondents failed to establish, on the evidence, that the appellants were sufficiently impecunious to justify an order for security for costs; substantial assets and availability of income were demonstrated by the appellants, and the application for security for costs appeared to be a tactical manoeuvre. Accordingly, the application for security for costs was dismissed, and costs awarded to the appellants.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application (security for Costs)
Outcome
Application for security for costs dismissed; costs awarded to appellants
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'appellate Procedure' 'costs']
['civil Procedure'] ['security for Costs' 'appellate Procedure' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Application (security for Costs)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether appellants should provide security for costs in the appeal' 'Whether appellants are impecunious so as to justify the order' 'Whether the application for security for costs is a tactical manoeuvre' 'Whether prospects of success of the appeal affect entitlement to security for costs']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents failed to establish, on the evidence, that the appellants were sufficiently impecunious to justify an order for security for costs; substantial assets and availability of income were demonstrated by the appellants, and the application for security for costs appeared to be a tactical manoeuvre. Accordingly, the application for security for costs was dismissed, and costs awarded to the appellants.

Court Disposition

Application for security for costs dismissed; costs awarded to appellants

Orders

  • ['The motion the subject of paragraph 2 of the notice of motion filed on 29 March 2004 and of paragraph 2 of the amended notice of motion filed on 7 April 2004 be dismissed.' "The respondents pay the appellants' costs of the notice of motion."]