Sky Cloud Pty Ltd v Shi [2017] FCA 1579
Given the lack of sufficient evidence about personal undertakings and financial means of those standing behind IT Express, and considering the balance of factors, an order for security for costs is appropriate in the amount of $100,000.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs / Application for Security for Costs Before Trial
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'impecuniosity' 'stultification' 'interlocutory Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs / Application for Security for Costs Before Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an order for security for costs should be made against the cross-claimants' 'Whether the provision of an undertaking by the second cross-claimant is sufficient to avoid making an order for security']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the lack of sufficient evidence about personal undertakings and financial means of those standing behind IT Express, and considering the balance of factors, an order for security for costs is appropriate in the amount of $100,000.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered
Orders
- ["The cross-claimants provide security for the cross-respondents' costs of the cross-claim in the sum of $100,000 up to trial." 'If an amount of the ordered security is proposed to be paid by the cross-claimants by March 2018, liberty is reserved for the cross-claimants to apply for the security to be paid by way of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment