Frigger, in the matter of Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd (in Liq) (No 3) [2021] FCA 21
The affidavit from Mr and Mrs Frigger should be accepted for filing as an affidavit in opposition to the application to dismiss the proceedings, but the interlocutory application should not be accepted for filing due to the stay order and the fact that it seeks to raise matters outside the scope of the present proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations and Corporate Insolvency / Interlocutory Application Prior to Hearing of Application to Dismiss Proceedings
- Outcome
- Interlocutory application not to be accepted for filing; affidavit accepted for filing as opposition to application to dismiss
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'stay of Proceedings' 'filing Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations and Corporate Insolvency / Interlocutory Application Prior to Hearing of Application to Dismiss Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiffs' interlocutory application should be accepted for filing given the stay order" "Whether the plaintiffs' affidavit should be accepted for filing in the context of an application to dismiss proceedings"]
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit from Mr and Mrs Frigger should be accepted for filing as an affidavit in opposition to the application to dismiss the proceedings, but the interlocutory application should not be accepted for filing due to the stay order and the fact that it seeks to raise matters outside the scope of the present proceedings.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory application not to be accepted for filing; affidavit accepted for filing as opposition to application to dismiss
Orders
- ['Pursuant to r 2.27(e) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) the proposed interlocutory application by the plaintiffs received by the Registry on 20 January 2021 not be accepted for filing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment