Ling v Beyond Development Group Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1251
The application for security for costs fails because it was brought at a late stage of proceedings without adequate explanation for the delay, and to order security now would potentially prejudice the just, quick and cheap resolution of the proceedings, especially as substantial security has already been provided in relation to another defendant and further delay would prejudice other parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Security for Costs Application / Procedural Interlocutory Ruling; Determination on Notice of Motion Prior to Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Notice of motion for security for costs dismissed; costs question reserved; procedural directions given.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'delay in Application' 'costs Orders' 'foreign Resident Plaintiffs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Security for Costs Application / Procedural Interlocutory Ruling; Determination on Notice of Motion Prior to Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered against foreign resident plaintiffs at a late stage of proceedings' 'Whether delay in making application for security affects discretion' 'Whether existing security for other defendants is relevant to the present application' 'Whether proceedings would be stultified by order for security']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for security for costs fails because it was brought at a late stage of proceedings without adequate explanation for the delay, and to order security now would potentially prejudice the just, quick and cheap resolution of the proceedings, especially as substantial security has already been provided in relation to another defendant and further delay would prejudice other parties.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion for security for costs dismissed; costs question reserved; procedural directions given.
Orders
- ['Dismiss the notice of motion.' 'Reserve the question of costs.' "Direct that an affidavit in relation to Ms Holt's expert evidence be filed and served by close of business on 30 September 2021."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment