Hillbrick Bicycles Pty Ltd v F45 Training Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1089

Hillbrick Bicycles Pty Ltd v F45 Training Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1089

Security for costs should not be ordered against Mr Smith because, even assuming impecuniosity, the respondents did not identify an additional factor justifying departure from the usual principle against ordering security from a natural person. The fact that the proceeding would benefit Mr Hillbrick was addressed by requiring Mr Hillbrick to provide security. Because Mr Hillbrick stood to benefit personally through his interests in Hillbrick Bicycles Pty Ltd and had sufficient personal assets, a suitably framed personal guarantee limited to $130,000 was adequate security, and a bank guarantee was not required.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 September 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs in an Intellectual Property Proceeding Involving Trade Mark Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Australian Consumer Law Contraventions and Passing Off Claims / Interlocutory Application Before Trial
Outcome
The respondents' application for security for costs was rejected insofar as it sought security against Mr Smith, but the Court considered that Mr Paul Hillbrick should provide a personal guarantee limited to $130,000; the parties were directed to prepare orders reflecting the reasons, and the respondents were...
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'natural Person Applicant' 'third Party Standing to Benefit From Proceeding' 'personal Guarantee as Security' 'prospects of Success Treated as Neutral Factor']
['practice and Procedure' 'intellectual Property' 'copyright and Industrial Designs' 'trade Marks' 'australian Consumer Law' 'passing Off'] ['security for Costs' 'natural Person Applicant' 'third Party Standing to Benefit From Proceeding' 'personal Guarantee as Security' 'prospects of Success Treated as Neutral Factor']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Security for Costs in an Intellectual Property Proceeding Involving Trade Mark Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Australian Consumer Law Contraventions and Passing Off Claims / Interlocutory Application Before Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an order for security for costs should be made against Mr Smith as a natural person.' 'Whether an order for security for costs should be made against Mr Hillbrick, the person who stands behind Hillbrick Bicycles Pty Ltd and who stood to benefit from the proceeding.' 'What form and amount of security should be provided if security were ordered.']

Ratio Decidendi

Security for costs should not be ordered against Mr Smith because, even assuming impecuniosity, the respondents did not identify an additional factor justifying departure from the usual principle against ordering security from a natural person. The fact that the proceeding would benefit Mr Hillbrick was addressed by requiring Mr Hillbrick to provide security. Because Mr Hillbrick stood to benefit personally through his interests in Hillbrick Bicycles Pty Ltd and had sufficient personal assets, a suitably framed personal guarantee limited to $130,000 was adequate security, and a bank guarantee was not required.

Court Disposition

The respondents' application for security for costs was rejected insofar as it sought security against Mr Smith, but the Court considered that Mr Paul Hillbrick should provide a personal guarantee limited to $130,000; the parties were directed to prepare orders reflecting the reasons, and the respondents were...

Orders

  • ['The parties prepare and submit an appropriate set of orders to reflect these reasons.' "The respondents are to pay the applicants' costs of the application filed on 22 May 2017." 'Mr Paul Hillbrick should execute a suitably framed personal guarantee limited to the sum of $130,000 to meet on demand any obligation...