Airberg Pty Ltd v Cut Price Deli Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1895
Because the second respondent sought payment of money held as security for costs, the third respondent consented, and the second respondent and his solicitors gave an undertaking that no attempt would be made to recover the balance of the taxed costs from Michael Douglas Faulkner or Antonietta Faulkner, the Court ordered payment of the $5,000 to the second respondent and ordered the first applicant to pay the second respondent's costs of the motion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Payment Out of Security for Costs / Motion Determined in the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Motion granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'payment Out of Money Held by the Court' 'taxed Costs' 'discontinuance' 'undertakings to the Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Payment Out of Security for Costs / Motion Determined in the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the amount of $5,000 held by the Court as security for costs should be paid forthwith to the second respondent.' 'Whether the undertaking that no attempt would be made to recover the balance of taxed costs from Michael Douglas Faulkner or Antonietta Faulkner was sufficient to address uncertainty about whether they remained parties.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the second respondent sought payment of money held as security for costs, the third respondent consented, and the second respondent and his solicitors gave an undertaking that no attempt would be made to recover the balance of the taxed costs from Michael Douglas Faulkner or Antonietta Faulkner, the Court ordered payment of the $5,000 to the second respondent and ordered the first applicant to pay the second respondent's costs of the motion.
Court Disposition
Motion granted.
Orders
- ['The amount of $5,000 held by the Court as security for costs be paid forthwith to the second respondent.' 'The first applicant pay the costs of the second respondent of the motion.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment