Dee-Tech Pty Limited v Neddam Holdings Pty Limited [2009] NSWSC 1095
The renewed application for security for costs was refused because it was brought on the first day of trial without explanation for the defendant's delay, much of the supporting information had been available earlier, and the plaintiffs' pleading was largely defensive to the defendant's claims for forfeiture of a lease and retaking possession.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs / Renewed Application on the First Day of Trial
- Outcome
- Application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'delay in Bringing Application' 'plaintiff in Substance in Position of Defendant']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs / Renewed Application on the First Day of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Pt 42 r 21 or the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335(1).' "Whether the defendant's unexplained delay in bringing the renewed application warranted refusal." 'Whether the plaintiffs were, in substance, largely defending claims by the defendant rather than acting as moving parties.']
Ratio Decidendi
The renewed application for security for costs was refused because it was brought on the first day of trial without explanation for the defendant's delay, much of the supporting information had been available earlier, and the plaintiffs' pleading was largely defensive to the defendant's claims for forfeiture of a lease and retaking possession.
Court Disposition
Application refused.
Orders
- ['The application for security for costs is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment