AUSTEUR PTY LIMITED v VLAHOS [1996] NSWCA 31
There were special circumstances (appellant's lack of assets, poor prospects of success, and potential inability to pay costs) justifying an order for security for costs, and the sum of $8,000 was appropriate given the issues and cost estimates.
- Parties
- Appellant / Opponent: Austeur Pty Limited; Respondent / Claimant: Sam Vlahos; Respondent / Claimant: Olga Vlahos
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Security for Costs Application in Appellate Proceedings / Court of Appeal—interlocutory Application Before the Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered; appeal stayed until security provided; costs of application to claimants.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Appeal Procedure, Possession of Premises, Mesne Profits, Adjournment of Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Austeur Pty Limited
Appellant / Opponent
Sam Vlahos
Respondent / Claimant
Olga Vlahos
Respondent / Claimant
Procedural Posture
Security for Costs Application in Appellate Proceedings / Court of Appeal—interlocutory Application Before the Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant (Austeur Pty Limited) should be ordered to provide security for the respondents' (Vlahos) costs of appeal
- 2 Whether special circumstances make it just for security to be ordered under Pt 51 r 11 of the Supreme Court Rules
Ratio Decidendi
There were special circumstances (appellant's lack of assets, poor prospects of success, and potential inability to pay costs) justifying an order for security for costs, and the sum of $8,000 was appropriate given the issues and cost estimates.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered; appeal stayed until security provided; costs of application to claimants.
Orders
- The appeal is stayed until the appellant provides security towards the respondents' costs of the appeal in the sum of $8,000 in such form as may be agreed by the parties or failing agreement settled by the Registrar.
- If the appellant fails to provide such security in such sum and in such form within twenty-eight days of today or such further time as the Registrar may allow, the respondents are at liberty to apply to the Court to have the appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment