Ceerose Pty Ltd v A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 239
Jurisdictional error was found in the adjudicator's determinations where, in several discrete items, the adjudicator failed to address the merits of the claims or to consider all submissions duly made by the plaintiff in support of its payment schedule or response, contrary to the requirements of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW). Such failures are essential breaches and result in the invalidity of the affected parts of the determination. Under s 32A of the Act, only affected parts are to be set aside, while unaffected parts are to be confirmed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Jurisdictional error found in respect of parts of both adjudication determinations. Relief not immediately granted pending submissions on form of orders. Directions given for parties to confer and matter listed for mention on 23 March 2023.
- Legal Topics
- ['security of Payment' 'jurisdictional Error' 'adjudication Determination' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the adjudication determinations under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) are affected by jurisdictional error' 'Whether the adjudicator failed to determine the merits of payment claims' 'Whether the adjudicator failed to consider all submissions duly made by the parties' 'Whether there was a substantial denial of procedural fairness or natural justice' 'Appropriate relief under s 32A of the Act in the event of jurisdictional error']
Ratio Decidendi
Jurisdictional error was found in the adjudicator's determinations where, in several discrete items, the adjudicator failed to address the merits of the claims or to consider all submissions duly made by the plaintiff in support of its payment schedule or response, contrary to the requirements of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW). Such failures are essential breaches and result in the invalidity of the affected parts of the determination. Under s 32A of the Act, only affected parts are to be set aside, while unaffected parts are to be confirmed.
Court Disposition
Jurisdictional error found in respect of parts of both adjudication determinations. Relief not immediately granted pending submissions on form of orders. Directions given for parties to confer and matter listed for mention on 23 March 2023.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment