R v TABORDA [2009] NSWDC 51
The seriousness of the offence, its aggravation by use of a weapon, the lack of sworn evidence supporting some mitigation, the partial utilitarian benefit from the plea of guilty, the relatively late plea, and personal circumstances led to a sentence below the standard non-parole period, taking into account but discounting certain mitigating claims.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'malicious Wounding With Intent to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm' 'intoxication']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for malicious wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm' 'Effect of intoxication as a mitigating or neutral factor' 'Effect of psychological trauma and circumstances in sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the offence, its aggravation by use of a weapon, the lack of sworn evidence supporting some mitigation, the partial utilitarian benefit from the plea of guilty, the relatively late plea, and personal circumstances led to a sentence below the standard non-parole period, taking into account but discounting certain mitigating claims.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- ['Imprisonment for a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months commencing 18 November 2007' 'Overall term of imprisonment set at 4 years and 8 months' 'Eligible for release to parole on 17 May 2010']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment