R v Shelley [2017] NSWDC 376
Mr Shelley's sentence reflects the objective gravity of his conduct, including violent armed robbery and bodily harm, balanced against his disadvantaged upbringing, drug addiction, and intellectual functioning. A 7-year head sentence with 5-year non-parole is appropriate, commencing from the date of offence and arrest. Referral for drug treatment assessment is ordered.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 7 years with a non-parole period of 5 years. Referred for assessment to compulsory drug treatment program.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'break Enter and Steal' 'home Invasion' 'armed Robbery' 'actual Bodily Harm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for break, enter and steal and armed robbery involving actual bodily harm']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Shelley's sentence reflects the objective gravity of his conduct, including violent armed robbery and bodily harm, balanced against his disadvantaged upbringing, drug addiction, and intellectual functioning. A 7-year head sentence with 5-year non-parole is appropriate, commencing from the date of offence and arrest. Referral for drug treatment assessment is ordered.
Court Disposition
The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 7 years with a non-parole period of 5 years. Referred for assessment to compulsory drug treatment program.
Orders
- ['Imprisonment for 7 years with a non-parole period of 5 years commencing 22 November 2016' 'Referral for assessment for compulsory drug treatment program']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment