Regina v Isidro IGLESIAS [2004] NSWSC 944
The offender, having pleaded guilty to murder and with significant mitigating and some aggravating factors (provocation, limited intellectual capacity, cooperation with authorities, use of a knife, non-impulsive attack), deserved a head sentence of 15 years with a non-parole period of 11 years, departing modestly from the usual statutory ratio due to special circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to imprisonment for fifteen years commencing 25 December 2002, with a non-parole period of eleven years. Eligible for parole on 24 December 2013.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'murder' 'plea of Guilty' 'provocation' 'use of Weapon in Homicide']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for murder where there was some provocation and a significant lapse of time between provocative conduct and killing?' "How should mitigating and aggravating circumstances be balanced, including cooperation with authorities, plea of guilty, offender's background, mental capacity, and other subjective factors?"]
Ratio Decidendi
The offender, having pleaded guilty to murder and with significant mitigating and some aggravating factors (provocation, limited intellectual capacity, cooperation with authorities, use of a knife, non-impulsive attack), deserved a head sentence of 15 years with a non-parole period of 11 years, departing modestly from the usual statutory ratio due to special circumstances.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to imprisonment for fifteen years commencing 25 December 2002, with a non-parole period of eleven years. Eligible for parole on 24 December 2013.
Orders
- ['Imprisonment for fifteen years to date from 25 December 2002' 'Non-parole period of eleven years' 'Eligible for release on parole on 24 December 2013']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment