R v Ma [2022] NSWDC 297
A full-time custodial sentence of 6 years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years is appropriate, reflecting a slight reduction below the standard non-parole period due to special circumstances (including dysfunctional upbringing and addiction), early guilty plea, but emphasising the seriousness of the offence and the need for deterrence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Imprisonment for 6 years with non-parole period of 4 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'manufacture of Prohibited Drug' 'proceeds of Crime']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for manufacturing a prohibited drug in an amount not less than the large commercial quantity' 'Consideration of proceeds of crime as Form 1 matter']
Ratio Decidendi
A full-time custodial sentence of 6 years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years is appropriate, reflecting a slight reduction below the standard non-parole period due to special circumstances (including dysfunctional upbringing and addiction), early guilty plea, but emphasising the seriousness of the offence and the need for deterrence.
Court Disposition
Imprisonment for 6 years with non-parole period of 4 years.
Orders
- ['The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for 6 years, commencing 15 August 2021.' 'A non-parole period of 4 years is fixed, expiring 14 August 2025.' 'A balance of term of 2 years commencing 15 August 2025 and expiring 14 August 2027.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment