R v Sanchez [2015] NSWDC 394
A sentence of 12 months imprisonment is appropriate for the offence of dealing with money reasonably suspected of being the proceeds of crime, with a 40% reduction for plea and assistance, balanced against the need to deter and reflect the objective seriousness of the conduct. Release on recognizance after 6 months is warranted due to significant and useful assistance and prior good character.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Offender: Mario Sanchez
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Sentenced to 12 months imprisonment; released after 6 months on recognizance release order; forfeiture order made under Proceeds of Crime Act.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Dealing With Money Reasonably Suspected of Being the Proceeds of Crime
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Mario Sanchez
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentencing the offender to a further period of full time custody is appropriate for dealing with money reasonably suspected of being the proceeds of crime
Ratio Decidendi
A sentence of 12 months imprisonment is appropriate for the offence of dealing with money reasonably suspected of being the proceeds of crime, with a 40% reduction for plea and assistance, balanced against the need to deter and reflect the objective seriousness of the conduct. Release on recognizance after 6 months is warranted due to significant and useful assistance and prior good character.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to 12 months imprisonment; released after 6 months on recognizance release order; forfeiture order made under Proceeds of Crime Act.
Orders
- Imprisonment for 12 months commencing 31 March 2015.
- To be released after serving 6 months (30 September 2015) upon entering into a recognizance to be of good behaviour for a period of 6 months expiring on 30 March 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment