R v AA (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 406

R v AA (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 406

In light of the Corrective Services assessment finding the offender suitable for home detention and a low risk of reoffending, and as foreshadowed in the original sentence, the Court imposed home detention as an additional condition of the Intensive Corrections Order.

Parties
Crown: Regina; Offender: AA (a pseudonym)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Consequential Orders Following Sentence
Outcome
Intensive Corrections Order varied to impose home detention as a condition for the remaining period, with supervision as assessed.
Legal Topics
Sentence, Intensive Corrections Order, Home Detention, Assessment of Suitability for Home Detention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

AA (a pseudonym)

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Consequential Orders Following Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the offender is suitable for home detention as an additional condition of the Intensive Corrections Order

Ratio Decidendi

In light of the Corrective Services assessment finding the offender suitable for home detention and a low risk of reoffending, and as foreshadowed in the original sentence, the Court imposed home detention as an additional condition of the Intensive Corrections Order.

Court Disposition

Intensive Corrections Order varied to impose home detention as a condition for the remaining period, with supervision as assessed.

Orders

  • The Intensive Corrections Order imposed on 24 December 2019 is subject to the following further additional condition: The offender is to be released to home detention for the remaining period of the Intensive Corrections Order and subject to the supervision and reporting regime directed by an officer of Hornsby...