R v Pineda [2021] NSWDC 849
The objective and subjective seriousness of the offences, supported by the substantial harm suffered by the victim as evidenced in material beyond the Victim Impact Statement, justifies an aggregate sentence of 7 years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years. The sentence is informed by the principles of denunciation, general and specific deterrence, the breach of trust, the age difference, and credible evidence of substantial harm. Special circumstances allow for a lower ratio of non-parole period to head sentence given the offender's first custodial term, isolation, and lack of local family support.
- Parties
- Crown: NSW DPP; Offender: Dominador Pineda
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 7 years with a non-parole period of 4 years. Special circumstances found.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Sexual Offences, Sexual Intercourse With Child Under 10, Aggregate Sentence, Victim Impact Statements, Objective Seriousness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NSW DPP
Crown
Dominador Pineda
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of appropriate sentence for two counts of sexual intercourse with a child under 10 years contrary to s 66A(1) Crimes Act 1900
- 2 Consideration of substantial harm aggravation based on victim impact
- 3 Assessment of objective and subjective seriousness and prospects for rehabilitation
Ratio Decidendi
The objective and subjective seriousness of the offences, supported by the substantial harm suffered by the victim as evidenced in material beyond the Victim Impact Statement, justifies an aggregate sentence of 7 years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years. The sentence is informed by the principles of denunciation, general and specific deterrence, the breach of trust, the age difference, and credible evidence of substantial harm. Special circumstances allow for a lower ratio of non-parole period to head sentence given the offender's first custodial term, isolation, and lack of local family support.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 7 years with a non-parole period of 4 years. Special circumstances found.
Orders
- Aggregate sentence of 7 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years, commencing 8 April 2020 (expires 7 April 2027; NPP expires 7 April 2024)
- Indicative sentence for Count 1: 5 years 3 months with NPP 3 years (Form 1 matters taken into account)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment